Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 06:49

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
FDA expands approval of Moderna's RSV vaccine to some adults under age 60 - ABC News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Wall Street floods into Bitcoin Futures as CME trader count hits all-time high - AMBCrypto
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How Fast Can The Suzuki Hayabusa Really Go? Here's What Riders Have Clocked - Jalopnik
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
50 Cent Pledges to Prevent a Trump Pardon for Sean Combs: ‘I’m Gonna Reach Out’ - Rolling Stone
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
US growth likely to slow to 1.6% this year, hobbled by Trump's trade wars, OECD says - ABC News
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
New Non-Opioid Drug Offers Powerful Pain Relief Without the Dangerous Side Effects - SciTechDaily
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Is the 4B movement's aggressiveness against men for seeing women as mantelpieces valid?